Abu Qatada could be freed

Abu Qatada could be freed

Jordanian terror suspect Abu Qatada could be freed on bail by the end of the month. Qatada, described by a judge as Osama bin Laden's right-hand man in Europe, will have his application for bail heard by a senior immigration judge on May 28, the Judicial Communications Office said.

The radical cleric is being held in a high security prison while he fights deportation to Jordan over terror charges. A Home Office spokeswoman said: "We believe Qatada poses a real risk to national security and will continue vigorously to resist any application for him to be bailed." Qatada's 10-year battle against deportation is in the hands of the British courts after the 51-year-old lost his attempt to make a final appeal to Europe's human rights judges earlier this month.

His lawyers immediately applied for him to be released on bail as it looks likely that deportation proceedings will still take many months. The political situation in Jordan has also worsened in recent months, casting fresh doubt on the UK's ability to deport him, they claim. The hearing will be held before Mr Justice Mitting at the Special Immigration Appeals Commission (Siac) in central London at 2pm on May 28.

Home Secretary Theresa May is likely to refuse any application by Qatada's lawyers to revoke his deportation order, but it is still likely to be "many months" before he is put on a plane home. If the Home Secretary also issues a certificate saying any application by Qatada to revoke the deportation order was "clearly unfounded", his lawyers would make an application to the High Court for a judicial review, which could be decided "in a very few weeks".

But if not, Qatada's legal team could appeal against her decision not to revoke the deportation order to Siac and the process, including any further appeals, could still take "many months". Repeated failed attempts by UK governments over the last 10 years to deport the radical cleric have cost nearly £1 million in legal fees, Government figures show.

No figures have been given for how much Qatada has received in legal aid and some estimates put the cost of keeping Qatada in the UK, either in a high-security jail or closely monitored under strict conditions in the community, along with the legal costs of the fight to deport him, at more than £3 million. Qatada, who is said to have wide and high-level support among extremists, was convicted in his absence in Jordan of involvement with terror attacks in 1998 and faces a retrial in his home country.

He also featured in hate sermons found on videos in the flat of one of the September 11 bombers. Since 2001, when fears of the domestic terror threat rose in the aftermath of the attacks, he has challenged, and ultimately thwarted, every attempt by the Government to detain and deport him.

Source

Email This BlogThis!Share to Twitter Share to Facebook

0 comments

Links to this post

Fury as blind people hit by reform

Abu Qatada could be freed Sdb_-_st_dunstans_centres_-_415_sectionImage

Government plans which could reduce state benefits paid to thousands of blind people have sparked a revolt by Liberal Democrat MPs in the latest sign of tension inside the Coalition over cuts. The Liberal Democrat rebels are demanding a U-turn after it emerged that many blind or partially-sighted people who currently receive disability living allowance (DLA) of up to £120 a week could lose out when it is replaced by a new personal independence payment (PIP) from next April.

Although Nick Clegg is defending the Government's plans, he is under intense pressure from his MPs to lobby for changes before the new system is implemented. Jo Swinson, his parliamentary aide, has written to Iain Duncan Smith, the Work and Pensions Secretary, urging a rethink after taking up cases on behalf of her constituents. Critics of the shake-up claim that the points system under which DLA claimants will be reassessed is biased against the blind because it puts too much emphasis on tasks such as the ability to walk and not enough on the special needs of those who cannot see.

The Government claims the two million people of working age on the benefit should be reassessed because 71 per cent of claimants remain on it for life. Opponents point out that the condition of blind people is not going to change. The Liberal Democrat rebels may try to force a Commons vote on the changes but hope to avoid that by persuading Mr Duncan Smith to revise his draft criteria. Mike Hancock, MP for Portsmouth South, criticised Mr Clegg and David Cameron for bringing forward the proposals.

He said: "It is manifestly unfair that blind people should be subjected to this worry so unnecessarily. Even in the worst days of the Thatcher government, we didn't see this sort of thing." Mr Hancock added: "This shows a complete lack of political nous in the leadership of the Coalition. It is one thing after another. They are coming up with ideas and not looking at the consequences. I did not get elected to punish people who cannot help themselves."

Sir Bob Russell, MP for Colchester, believed the impact on the blind was an "unintended consequence" of the reform and appealed to Mr Duncan Smith to hold urgent talks with charities representing the blind. "The Government needs to look afresh at this," he said. Jenny Willott, the Liberal Democrats' former welfare spokesman, said the draft criteria did not identify the needs of the blind clearly enough and hoped some revisions would be made.

Steve Winyard, head of campaigns at the Royal National Institute for the Blind (RNIB), said: "RNIB believes theproposed criteria for deciding who qualifies for PIP fail to recognise the daily challenges of living with sight-loss and risk leaving many without the support they need to live independently. "Everyday tasks which sighted people take for granted cost people with sight-loss extra money – for example paying for assistance with cleaning and ironing.

Other blind or partially sighted people may require food-labelling systems to ensure they don't eat out-of-date food. These costs are ongoing." Last night the Department of Work and Pensions (DWP) insisted that DLA is "an outdated benefit" with £630m of overpayments. It said PIP will be focused on those who need it most. A spokesman said: "PIP will not be automatically claimed because of a specific condition, but how that condition affects someone's everyday life.

The assessment is not yet finalised and we continue to work with disability organisations. We are considering their views as we decide what further improvements are needed." Mr Clegg said: "I support reform because many people have received DLA for year upon year without any assessment about whether their circumstances have changed. "[The test] needs to be objective and fair and rigorous so that maybe some people, far from losing it, will actually receive a higher award.

But, of course, we need to get the details right." Case study: 'What he said is a disgrace – it makes me livid' Siobhan Meade, 28, lives in Gorleston-On-Sea in Norfolk, and has been fully blind for more than 10 years. She is trying to gain employment in the media, and currently receives £280 per month in Disability Living Allowance.

"What Iain Duncan Smith has said is awful – for him to come out with such remarks is a disgrace. He's meant to be supporting people. I understand that the Government needs to save money, but the idea that disabled people are sitting about doing nothing makes me livid. It's so hard to get a job in the first place. I was born with very little sight, and in 1999 I lost the remaining sight that I had. "I'm a confident person, and I believe you have to be driven to achieve your aspirations.

Being blind means it's hard to get around, but even more difficult finding employment. Employers think: "Will it cost me more money?" when in fact there are schemes to support employers of disabled people. I wish they would give us an opportunity to showcase what we can do. "The cut to my Disability Living Allowance would mean that I could no longer pay for taxis, and I wouldn't be able to get media experience. I wouldn't be able to take pride in my appearance.

It seems like a luxury, but for me it's a necessity. I wouldn't even be able to afford a level indicator to make a cup of tea – it's the most simple thing in anyone's life, and I just wouldn't be able to do that. It's as if any job will do, but no it won't".

Source

Email This BlogThis!Share to Twitter Share to Facebook

0 comments

Links to this post

Amputees May Lose Benefits

Abu Qatada could be freed 15716594_400x240

Amputees could be among half a million people who are set to lose disability benefits under Government plans. Those in receipt of the disability living allowance (DLA) may no longer be eligible for its replacement, the personal independence payment, amid plans to slash the cost of benefits by more than £2.2bn.

Iain Duncan Smith , the Work and Pensions Secretary, defended the reforms which could see people without limbs, including ex-servicemen and women, no longer entitled to disability benefits as their everyday mobility is not undermined by their prosthetic limbs. He told the Daily Telegraph: "It's not like incapacity benefit, it's not a statement of sickness. "It is a gauge of your capability. In other words, 'Do you need care, do you need support to get around?'... Those are the two things that are measured. "Not, 'You have lost a limb'."

Mr Duncan Smith told the paper there had been a 30% rise in the number of claimants in recent years, with the annual cost of the benefits soon to reach £13bn. Under the reforms, two million claimants would reassessed in the next four years and only those considered to be in need of support allowed to qualify. Mr Duncan Smith said: "We are creating a new benefit, because the last benefit grew by something like 30% in the past few years. "It's been rising well ahead of any other gauge you might make about illness, sickness, disability or for that matter, general trends in society."

Ministers are consulting on the new eligibility criteria for the disability benefit system, which will be announced in the autumn.